A study of the spiritual and literary legacy of the book of Psalms. The collection will be analyzed according to literary types, and the individual psalms studied according to their genre and content. The use of Psalms in the history of the Church as a vehicle of worship will be a daily devotional focus to begin each class
Trinity College of Biblical Studies-Free Online Bible College
Register for this free Online Bible class by clicking on this link
This course will examine how the Psalms have been read, interpreted and proclaimed from the time of their composition through to today. Attention will be given to the questions relating to the formation of the book of Psalms, its use through history by Jews and Christians, current theological issues arising out of the Psalms and the exegesis of representative Psalms.
By the end of the course, students will be able to:
(1) Demonstrate a general knowledge of the structure, content and themes of the Book of Psalms
(2) Use basic exegetical skills to interpret the Psalter effectively and faithfully for today
(3) List and use exegetical resources
(4) Demonstrate an acquaintance with the history of the interpretation of the book of Psalms and other current issues in the study of the Psalms
(5) Demonstrate an acquaintance with how culture and gender affect the reading of Psalms
(6) Read the Psalms devotionally
1) Class Participation (20%) Students are expected to involve themselves fully through preparatory reading.
2) Book Report (20%).. The paper should demonstrate that you have read and understood the in this class. It should be 2-4 pages, double spaced and use size 12 font.
3) Theology Paper (20%)
4) Term Paper or Project (10%).
You may choose to write an exegesis paper (10-15 pages) on a psalm of your choice.
You may also wish to design a parish course based on the book of Psalms.
You may wish to write a paper on one particular personís interpretation of the Psalms.
If you are interested in the history of the interpretation of Psalms by women, you may be able to be part of a research project that involves finding the writings of women on the Psalms. Ask for more details.
You may want to explore the possibility of doing an artistic or multi-media project based on the Psalms.
5) Final (30%)
Email us for Lectures
To download Textbooks click on link
Introduction to the Psalms
St Augustin Exposition on the Book of Psalms
St Albans Psalter
Article on Hebrew Poetry
Biblical Art for Psalms
Trinity College of Biblical Studies-Undergraduate Studies
Trinity College of Biblical Studies Library
You may have noticed, if looking at a modern-day translation, that poetical portions of the Old Testament are organized into groups of normally two or three lines, and that very often the lines seem to say similar (or sometimes, contrasting) things. If so, you will have observed one of the basic concepts of Hebrew poetry.
Unlike much English poetry, the primary emphasis of Hebrew poetry is not rhythm or rhyme, but "parallelism." The basic thought unit (composed of two or three lines) can accomplish one of several different things.
Furthermore, several of these thought units (groups of lines) may together display additional parallelism or patterns. (Often English translations will separate these groups of verses from each other, by putting extra space between them.)
For those who like technical terms (and if not, then ignore this paragraph), the basic unit of thought is called a "period," and is composed of individual lines or segments. Each line is called a "colon" (or "stitch"). If the "periods" have some sort of parallelism or pattern in the way the thoughts are being expressed, these would be grouped together as a "strophe."
There are no "rigid" rules governing the flow of thought and the way the various lines relate to each other. So there will be much variety in the way thoughts are presented. But most verses will probably fit into one of the loosely defined categories listed below. (Be aware that some verses may overlap two of the categories listed. And because of the lack of "rigid" rules, there may even be times that one is not completely certain how to define the parallelism between parts of a thought-unit.)
The thoughts in the two lines may be identical, or just similar to each other. The entire passage may display this type of parallelism, or just part of it might.
"The earth" and "the world" are parallel thoughts. So are "all it contains" and "those who dwell in it."
In this passage, "a blessing from the LORD" and "righteousness from the God of his salvation" are parallel. The first part of the first line ("He shall receive") is not repeated.
This is an instance in which concepts are parallel, but definitely not synonymous! "The wicked" and "the weary" are parallel, but do not refer to the same group of people. Looking at death from the perspective of this present life, Job is saying that all human activity ceases at that point. Cemeteries are filled with people "resting in peace," not engaged in human activities.
This verse illustrates another feature that sometimes occurs in Hebrew poetry. "His delight" obviously parallels "he meditates," and "the law of the LORD" parallels "His law." But in the second line, these two thoughts occur in the reverse order to the way they occur in the first line. (If you are interested, the technical term is "chiasm.")
"More deceitful than all else" and "desperately sick" describe similar concepts. "Who can understand it" builds upon what is stated in the first two lines. (This second type of parallelism is described below.)
Some other examples of parallelism are: Genesis 4:23-24; Job 8:11; Job 8:15; Job 27:4; Psalm 22:20.
In this verse, the way of the righteous is contrasted to the way of the wicked.
Even the animals have homes - a place to rest. This is contrasted to the Son of Man's condition.
In this passage, "vision" and "the law" are similar concepts. [The "vision" (or "revelation" in some translations) has to do with prophetic revelation. Today we might say "the words of the prophets" or "Scripture."] Being unrestrained is contrasted with being happy ("blessed" in some translations) - the consequences of either the absence of the law, or its presence (coupled with obedience). This verse also provides another illustration of chiasm (two thoughts of the second line occurring in the reverse order to the way they occur in the first line).
Many of the verses which don't fit into any other category belong here. Sometimes there may be an obvious instance of something in the first line being repeated in the second. At other times, the thoughts may seem to just continue from the first to the second line, without any repetition.
This may occur in several ways. Two of them are illustrated below.
The second line builds on the first. "I shall not want" (or, "I shall lack nothing") is the natural consequence of the LORD being "my shepherd."
The last three lines (which are parallel, expressing similar thoughts) build upon (or flow from) the thoughts mentioned in the first line. Who is blessed? The one who doesn't do the things mentioned in the last 3 lines. (He also does what is mentioned in verse 2.)
The flow of thought is that the one is better than the other. There is also a contrast between the things mentioned (vegetables vs. fattened ox, and love vs. hatred).
The consequences of attempting to argue with God (line 1) would be speechlessness. God's wisdom and power are so great that we would find ourselves with nothing to say!
The flow of thought is first focused on being "born" (line 1) and then the futility of life (the consequences of being born!), which is summarized as "short-lived and full of turmoil."
The second line builds on the first, by describing where the King was being "installed."
The first two lines are parallel with similar thoughts; the third builds on them, giving the reason for telling the gates/doors to "lift up your heads." (This phrase, "lift up your heads" is also an example of the figurative use of language, mentioned in a section below.)
In this proverb, the second line builds on the first by describing the consequences of not following the first line's instructions.
It might seem that there is a somewhat similar pattern of thought between these two lines, but the second line really isn't a repeat of what the first line says. The two lines build on a common theme, each being one aspect of that theme. Job was convinced that he could not argue with God and survive. In every respect (including the matters of power and justice), God was superior.
Part of the first line is repeated in the second, but the thought is expanded, to reach the final climax of what is being said.
The climax of the statement is what the "sons of the mighty" are to ascribe to the LORD.
The passage reaches the climax in its description of the power of the LORD, by not only saying that he breaks the mighty trees, but that he splinters them into pieces. This psalmist seems to be making reference to the power of God as reflected in the mighty thunderbolts of a severe storm. (It is a common Old Testament theme that the wisdom and power of God is revealed in what he has created.)
In this instance, the second half of verse 3 is expanded in verse 4.
The psalmist wasn't claiming that his soul is a deer, but is like a deer in some manner. How? His soul longed for God in the same way a thirsting deer longs for water. And he's probably referring to a deer that is very thirsty!
The second line helps explain the meaning of the first line. The psalmist was describing the way he was being treated by others, rather than describing which species of organism he belonged to!
[There are many types of figures of speech, and they are commonly used in the English language. So we will not place a major emphasis on this form of parallelism.]
(Other examples: Psalm 24:9, which is mentioned in a previous section, and Proverbs 25:25.)
Some Psalms are structured in the form of an "alphabetical acrostic," with the lines beginning with the successive letters of the Hebrew alphabet. (An example in the English language would be a poem in which the first line started with "A," the second with "B," the third with "C," and so forth.)
Psalm 119 is the most famous psalm of this type, with 8 verses for each of the 22 Hebrew letters. Some others are Psalms 25, 34, and 37. Some of the alphabetical poems are irregular, with one of the letters perhaps "missing" or "misplaced." Perhaps the authors of the poems were more interested in the message, and were willing to break the pattern, if it were necessary, to accurately communicate what they needed to say.
In some passages, you will find a number used, followed in the next line by the next greater number. An example of this is:
In the first line, we find the number "three," while in the second line we find the number "four." It is not that the author couldn't count. Rather, he was using these numbers poetically, starting with one number ("three"), then "building upon it" (by addition) in order to reach the climax in the second line. This second number is the real number of items he intended to describe, as the context demonstrates. In many respects, this is a special instance of the third type of parallelism, mentioned above.
This may have been the reason that, after David killed Goliath and Israel had victory over the Philistines, the singers sang :
They would have been innocently adding a "0" to the end of the first number, for poetic climax. Saul however, did not think it was very "poetical"! (1 Samuel 18:8-9)
Some other examples of the poetical use of numbers includes: Proverbs 6:16 and the first two chapters of Amos.
Many of the same poetical structures that can be found in individual verses can also span across several verses - or even across entire chapters.
Psalm 1 - The first 3 verses (which describe the blessed man), form a contrast with verses 4-5 (which describe the fate of the wicked). Verse 6 is like a climax which summarizes the theme of the entire psalm.
Psalm 25 - This psalm has 4 sections, verses 1-3, 4-7, 8-15, and 16-21, with a final statement (prayer) in v. 22. The themes of the first and fourth sections are parallel, both being a prayer for relief from distress and slander. The two middle sections are also parallel, being a prayer for pardon and guidance (and confidence that it will be received.)
Even non-poetical (prose) sections of Scripture will sometimes have parallelism of one form or another. One example is found in Revelation 2-3, in which each of the seven letters follow a basic format (with only a few exceptions to the pattern): the letter's Destination, Commendation, Rebuke, Exhortation, and Promise.
Yes, it is possible to understand and benefit from the Scriptures without knowing all these things about Hebrew poetry. You will still be able to benefit from studying the Word of God. God's Word was written for all of us, not just for "experts" and "scholars."
But knowing these things may enable you to better understand some of the poetical portions of Scripture. And if this happens, you will benefit greatly from this knowledge.